<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/html" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>Ross Burton</title><link>http://www.burtonini.com/blog</link><description>A potted account of Ross' life</description><language>en</language><ttl>60</ttl><dc:creator>Ross Burton</dc:creator><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://pyblosxom.sourceforge.net/"/><admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:ross@burtonini.com"/><item><title>New Lens</title><guid isPermaLink="false">life/lens-2005-02-21-18-30</guid><link>http://www.burtonini.com/blog/life/lens-2005-02-21-18-30</link><description>Last week Hubert mentioned the new EOS-350D (very interesting improvement to the 300D) which I knew about already, and the ...</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[    <p>
      Last week Hubert mentioned the new EOS-350D (very interesting improvement
      to the 300D) which I knew about already, and the new <a
      href="http://www.canon.co.uk/for_home/product_finder/cameras/ef_lenses/macro_lenses/ef-s_60mm_f2.8_macro_usm/index.asp">EF-S
      60mm f/2.8 macro lens</a> which I missed.  Nice lens, I'm sure it will be
      way out of my budget but I want one anyway: sticking two close-up filters
      on a 50mm isn't quite the right way to do good macro work.  Nice to see
      Canon introduce more EF-S lenses, EF lenses work fine but thanks to the
      1.6x multiplier they sometimes just feel wrong.  The competition is also
      hotting up, with Sigma producing a <a
      href="http://www.sigma-imaging-uk.com/lenses/dclenses/30mm.htm">30mm
      f/1.4</a> (price TBD) and a <a
      href="http://www.sigma-imaging-uk.com/lenses/dclenses/18-125mm.htm">18-125mm
      f/3.5-5.6</a> (~&pound;230).  The 30mm would become a nice replacement for
      my 50mm f/1.8 which became an 80mm with DSLR, and the 18-125mm seems like
      a good compact general purpose to tele lens.
    </p>
    <p>
      <small>NP: <cite>Feed Me Weird Things</cite>, Squarepusher</small>
    </p>
]]></content:encoded><dc:date>2005-02-21T18:30:00Z</dc:date></item></channel></rss>