<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/html" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>Ross Burton</title><link>http://www.burtonini.com/blog</link><description>A potted account of Ross' life</description><language>en</language><ttl>60</ttl><dc:creator>Ross Burton</dc:creator><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://pyblosxom.sourceforge.net/"/><admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:ross@burtonini.com"/><item><title>Daily Mail Science</title><guid isPermaLink="false">life/dailymail-2005-02-28-15-25</guid><link>http://www.burtonini.com/blog/life/dailymail-2005-02-28-15-25</link><description>I just received my weekly A Worm's Eye View , the editorial which comes with The Guardian's news round-up service. ...</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[    <p>
      I just received my weekly <cite>A Worm's Eye View</cite>, the editorial
      which comes with <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">The Guardian's</a>
      news round-up service.  I may disagree with the author, <a
      href="http://www.thewormbook.com/helmintholog/">Andrew Brown</a>, on
      several issues (specifically he doesn't think Linux is any good, but at
      least he uses OO.o), but he is often right on the mark.
    </p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>
        Guardian readers can have little idea how dreadful the general coverage of
        science stories is in the British press. All distinction vanishes between
        chemists, social scientists, particle physicists, snail taxonomists,
        people who chop the heads of little chickens with giant scissors - they're
        all "scientists".
      </p>
      <p>
        All 'scientists' have one task. The Daily Mail subscribes to a radically
        simplified version of the atomic theory and everyone else tries to
        follow. According to this theory everything in the world is made from two
        kinds of basic substance: those that cure cancer, and those that cause
        it. The job of a scientist is to go through the world classifying
        everything into one category or the other. Every time something is
        identified as made of one sort of atom or the other, we have a story,
        preferably a scandal.
      </p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>
      <small>NP: <cite>Cafe Del Mar Volume 1</cite></small>
    </p>
]]></content:encoded><dc:date>2005-02-28T15:25:00Z</dc:date></item></channel></rss>