<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/html" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>Ross Burton</title><link>http://www.burtonini.com/blog</link><description>A potted account of Ross' life</description><language>en</language><ttl>60</ttl><dc:creator>Ross Burton</dc:creator><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://pyblosxom.sourceforge.net/"/><admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:ross@burtonini.com"/><item><title>Screaming Hordes of Benefit Tourists</title><guid isPermaLink="false">life/asylum-2005-04-28-17-50</guid><link>http://www.burtonini.com/blog/life/asylum-2005-04-28-17-50</link><description>Most Brits out there will probably remember the raving hysteria from the tabloid/right-wing press when the EU expanded to include ...</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[    <p>
      Most Brits out there will probably remember the raving hysteria from the
      tabloid/right-wing press when the EU expanded to include a few more
      Eastern European countries, explaining that hordes of "benefit tourists"
      are getting ready to move to England and claim benefit from the state.
    </p>
    <p>
      Well, that didn't quite happen (<a
      href="http://news.ft.com/cms/s/e9388868-b782-11d9-9f22-00000e2511c8.html">source</a>):
    </p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>
        The British Home Office said 133,000 people from the eight new EU
        countries in eastern Europe signed on to its worker registration scheme
        between May and December 2004.
      </p>
      <p>
        Of that total, up to 40 per cent were already in the UK before May
        1. Poles made up 56 per cent of the total, followed by Lithuanians and
        Slovaks. The UK has no figures on how many subsequently returned home.
      </p>
      <p>
        As for fears of an influx of benefit claimants, the UK tightened up its
        benefit rules before May 1 2004 and only 21 people from eastern European
        countries have made successful claims.
      </p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>
      <em>Twenty one</em> successful claims for benefit.  Wow, I bet the system
      really felt that blow.
    </p>
    <p>
      Of course the counter-argument is that the new "tightened benefit rules"
      are too tight, as I believe you need to be working here for a year before
      you can successfully claim benefit.  This implies that the people who
      claimed benefit were either already in the country or possibly got a job
      straight away, and results in a number of people in the impossible
      situation that they can't get benefit as they can't get a job, but they
      can't get a job as the Job Centre won't give them personal advise (again,
      you need to be working for a year to get personal advise) about a country
      and job market which is alien (as seen on <a
      href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/4454811.stm">Panorama</a>
      last week).
    </p>
    <p>
      It's all screwed up, basically.
    </p>
    <p>
      <small>NP: <cite>Best Of</cite>, Toots and The Maytals</small>
    </p>
]]></content:encoded><dc:date>2005-04-28T16:50:00Z</dc:date></item></channel></rss>