<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/html" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>Ross Burton</title><link>http://www.burtonini.com/blog</link><description>A potted account of Ross' life</description><language>en</language><ttl>60</ttl><dc:creator>Ross Burton</dc:creator><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://pyblosxom.sourceforge.net/"/><admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:ross@burtonini.com"/><item><title>Same Old Same Old</title><guid isPermaLink="false">computers/update-20031010</guid><link>http://www.burtonini.com/blog/computers/update-20031010</link><description>Dear Intel, &gt; Please make the Intel Pentium 4 sane.&lt;br &gt; Love, Ross. Intel Pentium 4's are weird. I do ...</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[  <p>
    Dear Intel,<br/>
    Please make the Intel Pentium 4 sane.<br/>
    Love, Ross.
  </p>
  <p>
    Intel Pentium 4's are weird.  I do a pretty-much null change (from looking
    at the assembler a jump table was re-ordered) and performance on the P4 is
    30% better, but the same binaries on a P3 have the expected identical
    performance.  I then optimised away some redundant code (again, looking at
    the assembler shows many instances of large chunks removed) and the program
    actually slows down.  This is starting to make optimising for speed not a
    Fun Game.  At least the ever-handy <a href="http://meld.sf.net">Meld</a> is
    showing its worth again, quickly and easily displaying the differences in
    two assembler files.
  </p>
  <p>
    <tt>monitor-calibration-tool</tt> is going well, I've rewritten most of it
    and the crack is slowly being removed.  Hopefully I'll be able to get
    another release out next week, which will be the first release to be useful
    (unless you are really weird and want to calibrate your screen for gamma
    1.0)
  </p>
  <p>
    Finally, it appears that IBM don't want my Java Reflection article, the
    corporate gits.  I blame SCO for this, I'm not sure how but I think blaming
    SCO is a positive action here.  If my second choice doesn't want to pay for
    it, then an absolutely fabulous article (if I do say so myself) will be
    online here next week or so.
  </p>
]]></content:encoded><dc:date>2003-10-10T07:39:55Z</dc:date></item></channel></rss>