<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/html" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>Ross Burton</title><link>http://www.burtonini.com/blog</link><description>A potted account of Ross' life</description><language>en</language><ttl>60</ttl><dc:creator>Ross Burton</dc:creator><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://pyblosxom.sourceforge.net/"/><admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:ross@burtonini.com"/><item><title>XICC in UFRaw</title><guid isPermaLink="false">computers/xicc/xicc-ufraw-2007-11-16-17-30</guid><link>http://www.burtonini.com/blog/computers/xicc/xicc-ufraw-2007-11-16-17-30</link><description>I just got an email from Udi Fuchs of UFRaw fame. The latest version of UFRaw, 0.13, supports the XICC ...</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[    <p>
      I just got an email from Udi Fuchs of UFRaw fame.  The latest version of
      UFRaw, 0.13, supports the <a
      href="http://burtonini.com/blog/computers/xicc">XICC specification</a> so
      it can adjust the image for correct display on your monitor.  Great,
      thanks Udi!
    </p>

    <p>
      <small>NP: <cite>Milieu</cite>, Tape</small>
    </p>
]]></content:encoded><category domain="http://www.burtonini.com">/computers/xicc</category><dc:date>2007-11-16T17:30:00Z</dc:date></item><item><title>The End Of Homeopathy?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">life/homoeopathy-2007-11-16-08-45</guid><link>http://www.burtonini.com/blog/life/homoeopathy-2007-11-16-08-45</link><description>Dr Ben Goldacre hits the jackpot, moving from a column on Saturday's Guardian to a cover story in Friday's Guardian ...</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[    <p>
      Dr Ben Goldacre hits the jackpot, moving from a column on Saturday's
      Guardian to a <a
        href="http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/a-kind-of-magic/">cover story in
        Friday's Guardian</a>.  It's a very balanced and reasoned argument
        against homoeopathy for people who don't understand what a fair trial
        is, how placebo works, or just how stupid homoeopaths sound when they
        try and explain it.  <a
        href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,2209998,00.html">It's down
        to permeated nano-particles</a>, apparently.
    </p>
    <p>
      I recommend reading the article to anyone who thinks that homoeopathy is
      better than placebo or agrees that homoeopathy has a place in treating
      AIDS and malaria.  Or people like me, who like watching homoeopathy get
      slapped down.  For the medical geeks out there, there is the companion <a
        href="http://www.badscience.net/2007/11/the-lancet-benefits-and-risks-of-homoeopathy/">article in the Lancet</a>
      too.
    </p>
]]></content:encoded><category domain="http://www.burtonini.com">/life</category><dc:date>2007-11-16T08:45:00Z</dc:date></item></channel></rss>